Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 27(18)2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1834267

ABSTRACT

We compared vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 between December 2021 and March 2022 when Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 were the dominating SARS-CoV-2 variants in Scania county, Sweden. Effectiveness remained above 80% after the transition from BA.1 to BA.2 among people with at least three vaccine doses but the point estimate decreased markedly to 54% among those with only two doses. Protection from prior infection was also lower after the transition to BA.2. Booster vaccination seems necessary to maintain sufficient protection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Sweden/epidemiology , Vaccine Efficacy
2.
Euro Surveill ; 27(9)2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1731712

ABSTRACT

We compared the risk of severe COVID-19 during two periods 2021 and 2022 when Delta and Omicron, respectively, were the dominating virus variants in Scania county, Sweden. We adjusted for differences in sex, age, comorbidities, prior infection and vaccination. Risk of severe disease from Omicron was markedly lower among vaccinated cases. It was also lower among the unvaccinated but remained high (> 5%) for older people and middle-aged men with two or more comorbidities. Efforts to increase vaccination uptake should continue.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Sweden/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 36(12): 1225-1229, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1588773
5.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 54(4): 283-291, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1557035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed patients are particularly vulnerable to severe infection from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), risking prolonged viremia and symptom duration. In this study we describe clinical and virological treatment outcomes in a heterogeneous group of patients with severe immunosuppression due to various causes suffering from COVID-19 infection, who were all treated with convalescent plasma (CCP) along with standard treatment. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective case series between May 2020 to March 2021 at three sites in Skåne, Sweden, with a population of nearly 1.4 million people. All patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who received CCP with the indication severe immunosuppression as defined by the treating physician were included in the study (n = 28). RESULTS: In total, 28 severely immunocompromised patients, half of which previously had been treated with rituximab, who had received in-hospital convalescent plasma treatment of COVID-19 were identified. One week after CCP treatment, 13 of 28 (46%) patients had improved clinically defined as a decrease of at least one point at the WHO-scale. Three patients had increased score points of whom two had died. For 12 patients, the WHO-scale was unchanged. CONCLUSION: As one of only few studies on CCP treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with severe immunosuppression, this study adds descriptive data. The study design prohibits conclusions on safety and efficacy, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to investigate this further.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunization, Passive , Immunocompromised Host , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sweden , COVID-19 Serotherapy
6.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 54(2): 128-133, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1442983

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 needs to be assessed in diverse real-world population settings. METHODS: A cohort study of 805,741 residents in Skåne county, Southern Sweden, aged 18-64 years, of whom 26,587 received at least one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Incidence rates of COVID-19 were estimated in sex- and age-adjusted analysis and stratified in two-week periods with substantial community spread of the disease. RESULTS: The estimated vaccine effectiveness in preventing infection ≥7 days after second dose was 86% (95% CI 72-94%) but only 42% (95% CI 14-63%) ≥14 days after a single dose. No difference in vaccine effectiveness was observed between females and males. Having a prior positive test was associated with 91% (95% CI 85-94%) effectiveness against new infection among the unvaccinated. CONCLUSION: A satisfactory effectiveness of BNT162b2 after the second dose was suggested, but with possibly substantially lower effect before the second dose.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Sweden/epidemiology , Vaccine Efficacy
9.
J Leukoc Biol ; 109(1): 115-120, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1188015

ABSTRACT

The disease COVID-19 has developed into a worldwide pandemic. Hyperinflammation and high levels of several cytokines, for example, IL-6, are observed in severe COVID-19 cases. However, little is known about the cellular origin of these cytokines. Here, we investigated whether circulating leukocytes from patients with COVID-19 had spontaneous cytokine production. Patients with hyperinflammatory COVID-19 (n = 6) and sepsis (n = 3) were included at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden. Healthy controls were also recruited (n = 5). Cytokines were measured in COVID-19 and sepsis patients using an Immulite immunoassay system. PBMCs were cultured with brefeldin A to allow cytokine accumulation. In parallel, LPS was used as an activator. Cells were analyzed for cytokines and surface markers by flow cytometry. High levels of IL-6 and measurable levels of IL-8 and TNF, but not IL-1ß, were observed in COVID-19 patients. Monocytes from COVID-19 patients had spontaneous production of IL-1ß and IL-8 (P = 0.0043), but not of TNF and IL-6, compared to controls. No spontaneous cytokine production was seen in lymphocytes from either patients or controls. Activation with LPS resulted in massive cytokine production by monocytes from COVID-19 patients and healthy controls, but not from sepsis patients. Finally, monocytes from COVID-19 patients produced more IL-1ß than from healthy controls (P = 0.0087) when activated. In conclusion, monocytes contribute partly to the ongoing hyperinflammation by production of IL-1ß and IL-8. Additionally, they are responsive to further activation. This data supports the notion of IL-1ß blockade in treatment of COVID-19. However, the source of the high levels of IL-6 remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Cytokines/immunology , Monocytes/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL